|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Terminal Insanity
Pwn 'N Play
SpaceMonkey's Alliance
921
   |
Posted - 2016.03.18 16:10:53 -
[1] - Quote
thats content! isnt it fun forming up 10 - 20 fleets every day to sit around and jump gates?! I certainly love it.
thanks fozzie
3 day old titan pilots, and endgame sov fought in intercepters. thats the eve i remember!
"War declarations are never officially considered griefing and are not a bannable offense, and it has been repeatedly stated by the developers that the possibility for non-consensual PvP is an intended feature." - CCP
|
Terminal Insanity
Pwn 'N Play
SpaceMonkey's Alliance
921
|
Posted - 2016.03.18 16:15:56 -
[2] - Quote
Kryptik Kai wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:Could the problem be else where and those no commitment attack just be a symptom? Is there any of those group actually interested in taking SOV? If they are not, what are the reasons? While attacking something just for the hell of it is totally a valid EVE gameplay, is it what this really is about? Villages not worth taking but we'll throw a flaming torch at the wall every night for the hell of it? Something something "We're not here to ruin the game, we're here to ruin YOUR game" Seriously tho, while wandsov isn't particularly inspired, its still better than the bs that came before it. You (SMA) chose systems to claim. You chose the vulnerability windows. You're part of the largest coalition in the game. Get your shtako together.
You only think its better than what came before, because you hold no sov and have no intention of holding sov. CCP created a gimmick for shitbrains to harass sov holders and force them to form 20 fleets a day to maintain sov from people who dont even want sov. That might be fun for the people who have NO INTENTION of taking the sov, but all it does is cause hundreds of other players to chug caffine to try and stay awake for the most boring fleets since highsec mining.
Its rather absurd that a bunch of noobs in tech1 frigates can cause so many boring defense fleets from the biggest coalition in the game.
"War declarations are never officially considered griefing and are not a bannable offense, and it has been repeatedly stated by the developers that the possibility for non-consensual PvP is an intended feature." - CCP
|
Terminal Insanity
Pwn 'N Play
SpaceMonkey's Alliance
921
|
Posted - 2016.03.18 16:35:40 -
[3] - Quote
Kryptik Kai wrote:Terminal Insanity wrote:
You only think its better than what came before, because you hold no sov and have no intention of holding sov.
We don't have sov?  Quote:You (horde) shouldnt be able to challenge sov Because screw the sandbox
well **** i'd like to get rid of concord. can we do that too?
"War declarations are never officially considered griefing and are not a bannable offense, and it has been repeatedly stated by the developers that the possibility for non-consensual PvP is an intended feature." - CCP
|
Terminal Insanity
Pwn 'N Play
SpaceMonkey's Alliance
922
|
Posted - 2016.03.18 16:36:57 -
[4] - Quote
Eddiie wrote:goons complaining about boredom and repetition ???
SUCK IT UP
Says the guys who reinforce a CSAA tower claiming it was to "generate content" and then dont show up to actually finish the job.
That was highly enjoyable, sitting on a jumpbridge for 2 hours waiting for you to not show up.
Great content 10/10 would fleet again
"War declarations are never officially considered griefing and are not a bannable offense, and it has been repeatedly stated by the developers that the possibility for non-consensual PvP is an intended feature." - CCP
|
|
|
| |
|